Skip to content

Conversation

@codeflash-ai
Copy link

@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot commented Oct 22, 2025

📄 34% (0.34x) speedup for _encode_trace_id in chromadb/telemetry/opentelemetry/grpc.py

⏱️ Runtime : 1.30 milliseconds 967 microseconds (best of 206 runs)

📝 Explanation and details

The optimization replaces the two-step process of binascii.hexlify().decode() with the native bytes.hex() method.

Key Change:

  • Original: binascii.hexlify(trace_id.to_bytes(16, "big")).decode()
  • Optimized: trace_id.to_bytes(16, "big").hex()

Why it's faster:

  1. Eliminates function call overhead - removes the need to call binascii.hexlify() and then .decode()
  2. Native C implementation - bytes.hex() is implemented directly in C within the Python interpreter, avoiding Python function call overhead
  3. Fewer intermediate objects - the original creates a bytes object from hexlify, then decodes it to string, while the optimized version goes directly from bytes to hex string

Performance benefits:
The line profiler shows a 25% reduction in per-hit time (518.9ns → 390ns), and the annotated tests demonstrate consistent 30-60% speedup across all test cases. The optimization is particularly effective for:

  • High-frequency telemetry operations where trace IDs are encoded repeatedly
  • Batch processing scenarios (32-38% faster in large-scale tests)
  • All trace ID value ranges, from zero to maximum 128-bit values

This is a classic example of leveraging built-in Python methods over library functions for better performance in hot code paths.

Correctness verification report:

Test Status
⚙️ Existing Unit Tests 🔘 None Found
🌀 Generated Regression Tests 4490 Passed
⏪ Replay Tests 🔘 None Found
🔎 Concolic Coverage Tests 🔘 None Found
📊 Tests Coverage 100.0%
🌀 Generated Regression Tests and Runtime
import binascii

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from chromadb.telemetry.opentelemetry.grpc import _encode_trace_id

# unit tests

# ----------------------
# Basic Test Cases
# ----------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_zero():
    # Trace ID 0 should be 32 zeroes
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(0) # 1.10μs -> 715ns (53.8% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_small_positive():
    # Small positive integer (1) should be 31 zeros and 1 at the end
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(1) # 1.12μs -> 712ns (57.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_small_hex():
    # Small positive integer (255) should be 30 zeros and 'ff' at the end
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(255) # 981ns -> 773ns (26.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_middle_value():
    # Middle value (2**63) should be 16 zeros, then '1', then 15 zeros
    expected = "0" * 15 + "1" + "0" * 16
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(2**63) # 1.13μs -> 819ns (38.0% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_max_128bit():
    # Maximum 128-bit value should be 32 'f's
    max_128bit = 2**128 - 1
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(max_128bit) # 1.12μs -> 737ns (51.6% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_typical_value():
    # Typical random value
    val = 0x123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef0
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 1.12μs -> 764ns (46.5% faster)

# ----------------------
# Edge Test Cases
# ----------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_negative_raises():
    # Negative values are not valid for trace IDs, should raise
    with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
        _encode_trace_id(-1) # 1.18μs -> 1.07μs (9.40% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_too_large_raises():
    # Values that don't fit in 16 bytes should raise
    with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
        _encode_trace_id(2**128) # 1.28μs -> 1.19μs (7.58% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_just_below_max():
    # 2**128 - 2 should be 32 'f's except last char is 'e'
    val = 2**128 - 2
    expected = "f" * 31 + "e"
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 1.23μs -> 891ns (37.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_single_byte():
    # 0x42 should be 31 zeros and '42'
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(0x42) # 1.15μs -> 763ns (50.3% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_highest_byte_set():
    # 0x80...0 (just the highest bit set)
    val = 1 << 127
    expected = "8" + "0" * 31
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 1.12μs -> 803ns (39.0% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_all_bytes_different():
    # 0x0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
    val = int("0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10", 16)
    expected = "0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10"
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 1.12μs -> 761ns (46.8% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_leading_zeros_preserved():
    # Value with leading zeros should still be 32 chars
    val = int("00000000000000000000000000000001", 16)
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 1.06μs -> 799ns (33.3% faster)

# ----------------------
# Large Scale Test Cases
# ----------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_many_sequential():
    # Test a range of sequential values
    for i in range(1000):
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(i); encoded = codeflash_output # 276μs -> 208μs (32.7% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_many_random():
    # Test a range of random values in the valid range
    import random
    for _ in range(100):
        val = random.randint(0, 2**128 - 1)
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 31.5μs -> 24.1μs (30.8% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_all_bytes():
    # Test all single-byte values in the 16th byte position
    for b in range(256):
        val = b
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 72.3μs -> 54.0μs (33.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_performance_large_batch():
    # Test performance on a batch of 1000 values near the upper bound
    # (Not a strict performance test, but makes sure it doesn't choke)
    base = 2**128 - 1000
    for i in range(base, base + 1000):
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(i); encoded = codeflash_output # 285μs -> 216μs (32.1% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
#------------------------------------------------
import binascii

# imports
import pytest  # used for our unit tests
from chromadb.telemetry.opentelemetry.grpc import _encode_trace_id

# unit tests

# ------------------------------
# 1. Basic Test Cases
# ------------------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_zero():
    # Test encoding of zero trace id
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(0); result = codeflash_output # 1.60μs -> 1.25μs (27.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_one():
    # Test encoding of trace id 1
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(1); result = codeflash_output # 1.35μs -> 937ns (44.5% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_typical_small_number():
    # Test encoding of a small number
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(123456789); result = codeflash_output # 1.30μs -> 878ns (47.6% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_typical_large_number():
    # Test encoding of a large number within 128 bits
    val = 0x123456789abcdef0123456789abcdef0
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); result = codeflash_output # 1.16μs -> 852ns (36.3% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_max_128bit():
    # Test encoding of maximum 128-bit value
    max_val = (1 << 128) - 1
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(max_val); result = codeflash_output # 1.16μs -> 798ns (45.9% faster)

# ------------------------------
# 2. Edge Test Cases
# ------------------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_negative():
    # Negative numbers should raise an error (cannot convert negative to bytes)
    with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
        _encode_trace_id(-1) # 1.18μs -> 1.04μs (13.4% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_too_large():
    # Numbers above 128 bits should raise an error (cannot fit in 16 bytes)
    with pytest.raises(OverflowError):
        _encode_trace_id(1 << 128) # 1.24μs -> 1.10μs (12.1% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_non_integer():
    # Non-integer input should raise an error
    with pytest.raises(AttributeError):
        _encode_trace_id("not_an_int") # 1.37μs -> 1.14μs (19.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_float():
    # Float input should raise an error
    with pytest.raises(AttributeError):
        _encode_trace_id(123.456) # 1.33μs -> 1.09μs (21.8% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_none():
    # None input should raise an error
    with pytest.raises(AttributeError):
        _encode_trace_id(None) # 1.28μs -> 1.17μs (10.2% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_minimum_positive():
    # Minimum positive trace id
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(1); result = codeflash_output # 1.47μs -> 997ns (47.1% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_highest_byte_set():
    # Only the highest byte set (0x80 followed by 15 zeros)
    val = 0x80 << (8*15)
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); result = codeflash_output # 1.30μs -> 814ns (59.5% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_lowest_byte_set():
    # Only the lowest byte set (0x80)
    val = 0x80
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); result = codeflash_output # 1.16μs -> 809ns (43.3% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_middle_byte_set():
    # Only the 8th byte set
    val = 0x80 << (8*8)
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); result = codeflash_output # 1.19μs -> 790ns (50.6% faster)

# ------------------------------
# 3. Large Scale Test Cases
# ------------------------------

def test_encode_trace_id_many_sequential_values():
    # Test encoding for a range of values to check for collisions and uniqueness
    results = set()
    for i in range(1000):
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(i); encoded = codeflash_output # 279μs -> 207μs (35.1% faster)
        results.add(encoded)

def test_encode_trace_id_large_random_values():
    # Test encoding for large random values within 128 bits
    import random
    for _ in range(100):
        val = random.randint(0, (1 << 128) - 1)
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 31.8μs -> 23.7μs (34.0% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_all_bytes_set():
    # Test encoding when each byte is set to a different value
    # e.g. 0x0102030405060708090a0b0c0d0e0f10
    val = int.from_bytes(bytes(range(1, 17)), "big")
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 998ns -> 684ns (45.9% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_performance_large_batch():
    # Test performance for large batch (not strict performance, just no error)
    for i in range(1000):
        val = i * 123456789
        codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 281μs -> 204μs (37.6% faster)

# ------------------------------
# 4. Additional Edge Cases
# ------------------------------

@pytest.mark.parametrize("val,expected", [
    (0, "00000000000000000000000000000000"),
    (255, "000000000000000000000000000000ff"),
    (256, "00000000000000000000000000000100"),
    ((1 << 64), "00000001000000000000000000000000"),
    ((1 << 127), "80000000000000000000000000000000"),
])
def test_encode_trace_id_various_values(val, expected):
    # Test encoding for various specific values
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val) # 5.68μs -> 3.90μs (45.8% faster)

def test_encode_trace_id_leading_zeros():
    # Test that leading zeros are preserved
    val = int("1234", 16)
    codeflash_output = _encode_trace_id(val); encoded = codeflash_output # 1.11μs -> 746ns (48.9% faster)
# codeflash_output is used to check that the output of the original code is the same as that of the optimized code.
#------------------------------------------------
from chromadb.telemetry.opentelemetry.grpc import _encode_trace_id
import pytest

def test__encode_trace_id():
    with pytest.raises(TypeError, match="a\\ bytes\\-like\\ object\\ is\\ required,\\ not\\ 'SymbolicBytes'"):
        _encode_trace_id(0)

To edit these changes git checkout codeflash/optimize-_encode_trace_id-mh1tayd0 and push.

Codeflash

The optimization replaces the two-step process of `binascii.hexlify().decode()` with the native `bytes.hex()` method. 

**Key Change:**
- **Original:** `binascii.hexlify(trace_id.to_bytes(16, "big")).decode()`
- **Optimized:** `trace_id.to_bytes(16, "big").hex()`

**Why it's faster:**
1. **Eliminates function call overhead** - removes the need to call `binascii.hexlify()` and then `.decode()`
2. **Native C implementation** - `bytes.hex()` is implemented directly in C within the Python interpreter, avoiding Python function call overhead
3. **Fewer intermediate objects** - the original creates a bytes object from hexlify, then decodes it to string, while the optimized version goes directly from bytes to hex string

**Performance benefits:**
The line profiler shows a **25% reduction in per-hit time** (518.9ns → 390ns), and the annotated tests demonstrate consistent **30-60% speedup** across all test cases. The optimization is particularly effective for:
- High-frequency telemetry operations where trace IDs are encoded repeatedly
- Batch processing scenarios (32-38% faster in large-scale tests)
- All trace ID value ranges, from zero to maximum 128-bit values

This is a classic example of leveraging built-in Python methods over library functions for better performance in hot code paths.
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot requested a review from mashraf-222 October 22, 2025 09:50
@codeflash-ai codeflash-ai bot added the ⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI label Oct 22, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

⚡️ codeflash Optimization PR opened by Codeflash AI

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

0 participants